By Robert Parry
February 15, 2010
The New York Times simply refuses to deal with “enemy” Muslim states with any sense of objectivity or fairness, reaffirming its deep-seated bias again on Sunday with the publication of a one-sided article about the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri on its fifth anniversary.
Read on.
1 comment:
Like most of what you write, this is another story full of half truths and outright lies.
The case for Syrian involvement is weak? Give me break.
Hussam’s recantation of his testimony probably had something to do with the jailing of his family in Damascus, or. And as far as using “swindlers” as witnesses, (Saddik), I would think that your reliance on swindlers for key sources (Ben-Menashe) would leave you predisposed to taking anything they say at face value.
What happened? Have you suddenly discovered integrity?
Post a Comment