The eulogies for Washington Post columnist David Broder and the chaos surrounding National Public Radio have coincided as an unintended commentary on what went wrong with the U.S. news media.
I sadly agree that NPR is "not worth saving". I suspect that NPR does more harm than good in that it allows potentially "thinking" news consumers to believe they have reviewed the "facts". Yes, there is a bit less celebrity babble, but hardly any probing.
I sadly agree that NPR is "not worth saving". I suspect that NPR does more harm than good in that it allows potentially "thinking" news consumers to believe they have reviewed the "facts". Yes, there is a bit less celebrity babble, but hardly any probing.
Having a "liberal bias" must be akin to having a disease like measles or appendicitus. Once a conservative has made the diagnosis, the disease can be treated. Removed, perhaps. Or perhaps medication will suffice.
Of course, there are those who have never really met anyone with a "liberal bias." It seems that they may not even have met anyone with an "agenda" which has become a pejorative for those with whom one disagrees.
My father was one of a number of originators of the liberal left and while I loved him as a "Dad" I certainly disagree with many of his (their) views. I have grown.
I merely re-evaluate along with 40's writer Robert Benchley:
"My years in a quandary and how they grew."
I do not approve of ALL "liberals".
The analyses of "How the US Press Corps Lost Its Way" are excellently documented and require no additional comment.
5 comments:
I sadly agree that NPR is "not worth saving". I suspect that NPR does more harm than good in that it allows potentially "thinking" news consumers to believe they have reviewed the "facts". Yes, there is a bit less celebrity babble, but hardly any probing.
I sadly agree that NPR is "not worth saving". I suspect that NPR does more harm than good in that it allows potentially "thinking" news consumers to believe they have reviewed the "facts". Yes, there is a bit less celebrity babble, but hardly any probing.
The author seems to have a considerable liberal bias.
This article hits the nail on the head. David Broder was a wishy wash who saw evil through rose colored glasses.
I am still appalled at how much evil there is in government and the world.
I am waiting for the honest knight in shining amour to show up.
Doesn't anyone care about right and wrong anymore?
No, just money, the root of all evil.
LIBERAL BIAS
Having a "liberal bias" must be
akin to having a disease like
measles or appendicitus. Once
a conservative has made the
diagnosis, the disease can be
treated. Removed, perhaps. Or
perhaps medication will suffice.
Of course, there are those who have
never really met anyone with a
"liberal bias." It seems that they
may not even have met anyone with
an "agenda" which has become a pejorative for those with whom
one disagrees.
My father was one of a number of
originators of the liberal left
and while I loved him as a "Dad"
I certainly disagree with many
of his (their) views. I have grown.
I merely re-evaluate along with
40's writer Robert Benchley:
"My years in a quandary and how
they grew."
I do not approve of ALL "liberals".
The analyses of "How the US Press
Corps Lost Its Way" are excellently
documented and require no
additional comment.
email:peterloeb@yahoo.com
Post a Comment