Oliver Stone is under attack again, which isn’t a surprise, given that no other filmmaker has been so willing to challenge the “conventional wisdom” in an effort to uncover the facts about important events.
Also don't forget to look at John Pilger's film online- "the War on Democracy" which is enlightening. It is sad that US leaders and commentators are so against overcoming illiteracy, extreme poverty, foreign ownership and control of national resources...all of which Chavez has tackled with true grassroots local democratic input by those in most need, who have been neglected by the imperialist powers for centuries.
Lisa Pease unwittingly reveals her bias (or her ignorance)when she writes:
"Stone meets, separately and in groups, with Hugo Chávez (President of Venezuela), Evo Morales (President of Bolivia), Lula da Silva (President of Brazil), Rafael Correa (President of Ecuador), Cristina Kirchner (President of Argentina) as well as her husband Nìstor Kirchner (former President of Argentina), and Raúl Castro (currently running Cuba for his ailing brother Fidel).
The author grants each of these heads of state their proper titles EXCEPT for Raul Castro....
I suppose her ignorance can be forgiven, since US citizens are denied the right to travel to Cuba and to see for themselves how participatory democracy works there.
It's a well known fact that for many here in the U.S Latin America represents the vices of third- world backwardness:corruption, despotism, authoritarianism, ignorance, etc.,etc. Under such circumstances and the fact that it's being regarded, by many too, as the U.S "back yard" it's been almost impossible for Latin America to build up genuinely democratic institutions in accordance with the needs and interest of its people.
For that reason when leaders like Hugo Chavez take on that challenge in defiance of the "Big Boss of the North" they are immediately attacked an demonized by the CM.
It was Operation Ajax that convinced Castro to give up the democratic process. After seeing the CIA conspire and use political assassinations to overthrow a democratically elected leader in Guatemala, who can honestly find fault with Castro's reasoning?
I fully acknowledge my ignorance and error in not acknowledging Raul as a duly elected representative of the people. My apologies! I meant no disrespect, at all.
8 comments:
Also don't forget to look at John Pilger's film online- "the War on Democracy" which is enlightening. It is sad that US leaders and commentators are so against overcoming illiteracy, extreme poverty, foreign ownership and control of national resources...all of which Chavez has tackled with true grassroots local democratic input by those in most need, who have been neglected by the imperialist powers for centuries.
Lisa Pease unwittingly reveals her bias (or her ignorance)when she writes:
"Stone meets, separately and in groups, with Hugo Chávez (President of Venezuela), Evo Morales (President of Bolivia), Lula da Silva (President of Brazil), Rafael Correa (President of Ecuador), Cristina Kirchner (President of Argentina) as well as her husband Nìstor Kirchner (former President of Argentina), and Raúl Castro (currently running Cuba for his ailing brother Fidel).
The author grants each of these heads of state their proper titles EXCEPT for Raul Castro....
I suppose her ignorance can be forgiven, since US citizens are denied the right to travel to Cuba and to see for themselves how participatory democracy works there.
It's a well known fact that for many here in the U.S Latin America represents the vices of third- world backwardness:corruption, despotism, authoritarianism, ignorance, etc.,etc. Under such circumstances and the fact that it's being regarded, by many too, as the U.S "back yard" it's been almost impossible for Latin America to build up genuinely democratic institutions in accordance with the needs and interest of its people.
For that reason when leaders like Hugo Chavez take on that challenge in defiance of the "Big Boss of the North" they are immediately attacked an demonized by the CM.
Anonymous~
THAT's you beef???
~John L.
The dirty tricks the USA/UK get upto...
http://tinyurl.com/26g2mf3
And here...
http://tinyurl.com/2va6dpb
You want more?.
It was Operation Ajax that convinced Castro to give up the democratic process. After seeing the CIA conspire and use political assassinations to overthrow a democratically elected leader in Guatemala, who can honestly find fault with Castro's reasoning?
The truth will set us free.
Er, Sorry, Ajax was Iran in 1953... It was Operation Success in 1954 that ousted Arbenz in Guatemala.
I fully acknowledge my ignorance and error in not acknowledging Raul as a duly elected representative of the people. My apologies! I meant no disrespect, at all.
Post a Comment