Thursday, September 02, 2010

WikiLeaks and Defining 'Journalism'

By D.H. Kerby
September 2, 2010

There is a strong intuition among the American people that there is a fundamental difference between publishing a secret for all the world to read and secretly informing an enemy of a secret.

Read on.

Posted by at

3 comments:

Michael McCollough said...

If you're counting on the common sense of the American people I suspect you are going to be sorely disappointed.

Sat Sep 04, 10:11:00 AM 2010
Anonymous said...

In agreement with Michael McCollough. The American public is fascinated with Fox/Beck /Limbaugh. Fox news has taken some important, positive, videos of Assange/Wikileaks mission and intentions down, claiming copyright. Americans have made their own brains into jelly by not investigating other media sources and caring about their goverment and what is happening Internationaly. If the press and especially investigative journalists does not stand up and include sources like Wikileaks in legal protection, then they might as well take up another profession.
Perhaps running a copy machine for government intelligence agencies. At lease we would not wonder whose pocket they operated from.

Sun Sep 05, 11:59:00 AM 2010
Anonymous said...

This is only classified secret to the American public who pay the bills in blood and money -borrowed in our name.
The victims, the "enemy" knows damn well what the US is doing to them, as does most of the rest of the world...
~John L.

Tue Sep 07, 09:26:00 PM 2010

Post a Comment